Successors to Trudeau in Debate, Emphasizing Opposition to Trump

On February 24, 2025, a televised debate featuring the leading candidates for Canada’s next prime minister took place. The debate, conducted in French, was a crucial moment in the race to determine the successor to Justin Trudeau. The discussion centered on various pressing issues, but the most heated exchanges revolved around how Canada should respond to former U.S. President Donald Trump, who has once again become a dominant figure in North American politics.

A Conservative Lead: The Initial Political Landscape

Let’s go back and see how politics in Canada have been going! For much of the past year, the Conservative Party of Canada, led by Pierre Poilievre, seemed unstoppable. Poll after poll showed them in a commanding lead, as they hammered away at Trudeau’s Liberal government for what they described as years of economic stagnation, rising inflation, and weakened social stability. As a matter of fact, GDP per capita, a key measure of living standards, declined by 0.4% in the third quarter, marking its sixth consecutive quarterly drop. The carbon tax, the housing affordability crisis, and tensions with the business community became major talking points, with the Conservatives promising to reverse what they saw as failed policies.

Shifting Momentum: A Less Certain Conservative Victory

But politics is never that simple. In recent weeks, the Liberal Party has started to claw its way back. New leadership strategies and a reinvigorated campaign have injected fresh energy into what many thought was a fading movement. According to a Reuters report from February 19, 2025, cites polling data with the Conservatives at 39% and the Liberals at 32%. This suggests a narrowing gap compared to previous months, where the Conservatives held a more substantial lead. The February 24 debate made one thing clear: the Liberals are not going down without a fight. The debate also exposed cracks in the Conservative Party’s armor, particularly on foreign policy. With Trump’s influence looming large over North America, the Conservatives’ approach to U.S.-Canada relations is now under the microscope, and voters are taking notice.

So, let’s take a closer look at their policies and what each candidate aims to accomplish in office.

Chrystia Freeland’s Strategy: Countering Trump with International Alliances

Chrystia Freeland delivered one of the most memorable moments of the night when she called Trump the biggest threat to Canada since World War II. She argued that Canada must prepare itself for a turbulent economic future and proposed forming an international coalition to counter Trump’s aggressive trade policies. Her message was clear: Canada cannot rely solely on the U.S. and must build stronger alliances with Europe and Asia. This bold stance resonated with some viewers, painting her as a leader ready to take decisive action on the global stage.

Mark Carney’s Economic Focus: Stability Over Rhetoric

Meanwhile, Mark Carney took a more measured approach. Rather than focus on rhetoric, he positioned himself as the steady hand Canada needs in times of uncertainty. Drawing on his experience as the former governor of the Bank of Canada, Carney emphasized his ability to navigate economic turbulence and maintain financial stability. He criticized Conservative plans to repeal the carbon tax, arguing that such moves would discourage investment in green technology and ultimately harm Canada’s economy in the long run. Moreover, he is going to clarify the TCVCM system. This standard evaluates and certifies high-integrity emission reduction projects in the carbon credit market.

Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Vision: Rolling Back Trudeau-Era Policies

Pierre Poilievre did not back down. He reaffirmed his commitment to rolling back what he called the disastrous Trudeau-era policies. From eliminating the carbon tax to cutting government spending, Poilievre doubled down on his promise to put more money back in Canadians’ pockets. His economic vision revolves around reducing government intervention and empowering businesses to drive growth. But he faced tough questions about his foreign policy, particularly how he would handle trade with a potentially protectionist Trump administration.

Karina Gould’s Social Policy Agenda: A Focus on Domestic Issues

Former Liberal minister Karina Gould took a different approach, focusing on domestic policies rather than international tensions. She championed social programs like childcare, healthcare, and support for marginalized communities, arguing that Canada’s strength lies in its people. While she agreed with Freeland on the need to counter Trump’s influence, she stressed that Canada must also invest in its own institutions and citizens.

A Tightening Race: The Uncertain Path to Election Day

So, where does this leave us? The debate made one thing clear: this race is far from over. Poilievre is still the frontrunner, but the Liberals have found new momentum, especially by framing this election as a battle for Canada’s future in the face of global uncertainty. With Trump’s shadow looming over North America, voters must now decide which candidate is best equipped to navigate the challenges ahead.

Beyond the issue of former President Trump, climate change remains a crucial topic of debate. Even if Trump takes a sharp turn away from global climate action, Canada appears committed to continuing its efforts to combat climate change. As a result, businesses will face a growing need to consider their environmental impact.

At Carbon Da Capo, we provide carbon credits—an increasingly recognized and effective solution. Through these credits, everyone can play a role in addressing climate change. Let’s take action together.