The U.S. Military’s Transgender Ban and Recent Gender Policies

On February 26, 2025, the U.S. Department of Defense submitted a memorandum to the court outlining new restrictions on transgender service members. Under this policy, transgender individuals will be removed from military service unless granted special exceptions. Additionally, new transgender recruits will be prohibited from enlisting, effectively banning their service in the U.S. military.

This decision follows an executive order signed by President Donald Trump in January 2025, which abolished diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs within the military. The order explicitly aimed to exclude transgender individuals whose biological sex does not align with their gender identity. The Pentagon also announced a cessation of medical and psychological support for transgender personnel. This move marks a significant shift from the policies under the Biden administration, which had allowed transgender individuals to serve openly and receive necessary medical care.

Uncertainty for 14,000 Transgender Service Members

The Department of Defense’s memo states that within 30 days, a procedure will be established to identify transgender service members. Within the following 30 days, the removal process for affected personnel will commence. The justification for these policies, according to the memo, is to enhance military readiness, cohesion, and integrity.

Of course, there are critics. They argue that this policy is unprecedented and discriminatory, claiming it violates the Fifth Amendment’s equal protection clause. Legal challenges are expected, with advocacy groups asserting that it undermines principles of equality and non-discrimination. A 2018 independent study by the Palm Center, which focuses on LGBTQ issues, estimated that there are approximately 14,000 transgender service members among the over 2 million troops currently serving. These service members face uncertain futures as the policy could have wide-ranging implications for their careers and livelihoods. Additionally, this policy has another problem. The removal of these service members could reduce the available workforce, which might impact overall military readiness and weaken the military’s ability to respond to national security needs.

The Broader Landscape of Gender Policies in the U.S.

This recent military policy is part of a broader trend in the U.S. regarding gender identity and legal protections. The issue has been highly contentious in recent years, with federal and state governments taking opposing stances on transgender rights in various domains, including education, healthcare, and sports.

Education and Transgender Rights

Several states have implemented laws restricting transgender students from using bathrooms and locker rooms that align with their gender identity. Additionally, bans on discussing gender identity and sexual orientation in classrooms have gained traction, particularly in conservative-leaning states. Take Ohio as an example, policies regarding transgender students are strict. In 2024, the governor signed a bill banning students from using bathrooms and locker rooms that align with their gender identity. Additionally, education on gender identity and sexual orientation is restricted, particularly in elementary schools. These policies have been criticized for limiting the rights of transgender students.

In contrast, progressive states such as California and New York have expanded protections for transgender students, ensuring access to gender-affirming facilities and inclusive curricula.

Healthcare and Gender-Affirming Care

One of the most contentious debates involves gender-affirming healthcare for transgender individuals, particularly minors. Many Republican-led states have enacted bans on puberty blockers, hormone therapies, and gender-affirming surgeries for individuals under 18, citing concerns over long-term health effects and the ability of minors to make such significant medical decisions. In response, states such as Washington, Massachusetts, and Oregon have implemented “sanctuary laws” that protect transgender youth and their families who seek gender-affirming care by preventing out-of-state legal action against them.

Transgender Athletes and Sports Restrictions

Another major battleground is transgender participation in sports. Over 20 states have passed laws barring transgender women and girls from competing in women’s sports, arguing that biological differences provide unfair advantages. The Department of Education under the Trump administration interpreted Title IX, a law that prohibits discrimination based on sex in education, as excluding transgender girls from competing in women’s sports if they were biologically male at birth. This stance was supported by conservative lawmakers who argued that transgender women had a competitive advantage over cisgender women in sports.

Around the World

Outside of the United States, there are regions where legal protections for transgender people are advancing. For example, Argentina passed a law in 2012 allowing individuals to change their gender based on self-identification, and countries like Canada and the UK have improved access to healthcare services for transgender individuals. In India, the Supreme Court recognized transgender people as a “third gender,” leading to greater social acceptance. However, in some countries such as Poland and Hungary, policies restricting transgender rights have been introduced. In these countries, amendments to laws prohibiting discrimination based on gender have led to setbacks in legal protections for transgender people, and calls for expanding their rights are growing.

Conclusion

The recent decision to ban transgender individuals from serving in the U.S. military reflects a broader movement toward restricting transgender rights in multiple areas, from healthcare to education and sports. The policy has sparked significant backlash from LGBTQ+ advocacy groups and legal experts, who argue that it undermines equality and inclusion.

In the U.S., DEI is being opposed recently especially by Donald Trump and those policies and laws that restrict transgender’s right are revised. The U.S. has a significant influence on the world both economically and socially, so this country’s movement is important and we need to prepare for this. As a part of isolation, the U.S. has retired from Paris agreement as well. This big country stop movement for this world or society, what is waiting for us is getting worse. So from individuals need to take action. At carbon Da Capo, we are supporting those actions through carbon credits. So, let’s make a difference together!